WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump announced Monday that the United States would move forward with plans to acquire Greenland, describing the effort as a necessary step toward restoring unlimited shrimp access for the American people.
The decision follows remarks by Tom Dans, chairman of the U.S. Arctic Research Commission, who recently argued that American control of Greenland’s seafood production could help bring back Red Lobster’s famous Endless Shrimp promotion.
“My view is that the United States could take all the seafood Greenland could produce, and cut out the middleman, and keep it from China—and you could bring back all-you-can-eat shrimp at Red Lobster.”
Administration officials stressed that the operation is not solely about shrimp, though they acknowledged that shrimp now appears in every section of the strategic planning documents.
A briefing released by the White House lists several objectives, including Arctic security, economic development, seafood independence, buffet stabilization, and “the long-term restoration of abundance-based shrimp policies.”
Military planners have reportedly been instructed to evaluate Greenland’s ports, infrastructure, and estimated shrimp output.
“This is what grand strategy is about,” said one administration official. “You have to think decades ahead. Most Americans only see a basket of shrimp. Policymakers see a secure and prosperous shrimp future.”
The government of Greenland condemned the announcement, while Danish officials expressed confusion over being drawn into what one diplomat described as “a dispute involving shellfish and casual dining.”
Reaction among Red Lobster customers was more favorable.
“People don’t realize the difference,” said restaurant patron Gary Wilkins of Jacksonville, Florida, while examining a plate of shrimp. “Greenland shrimp have a cleaner flavor profile. Better texture. More depth. You can taste the Arctic. Once you’ve had Greenland shrimp, regular shrimp just feels geopolitically naïve.”
Wilkins said he was encouraged that national leaders were finally treating the issue with the seriousness it deserves.
“For years we’ve been talking about border security, energy security, and supply chains,” he said. “Nobody wanted to talk about shrimp security.”
Experts were divided over whether annexing an Arctic territory would materially affect restaurant promotions.
Several economists noted that Red Lobster already restored Endless Shrimp without acquiring Greenland.
Administration officials responded that this merely demonstrated the potential benefits of future Greenland ownership.
“Imagine how much shrimp there could be,” said one aide.
At press time, Trump was reportedly asking advisers whether Canadian sovereignty represented a barrier to unlimited crab legs.
Source Material
Tom Dans’ remarks were reported in The New Yorker:
Additional coverage: